Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language and Speech
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flege, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Physiological Specification of American English Vowels

James Emil Flege

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Samuel G. Fletcher

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Martin J. McCutcheon

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Steven C. Smith

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Use of a new opto-elcctronic device showed that the stressed vowels produced by a native speaker of English could be clearly differentiated according to tongue position. The distance of the tongue from four sensors located along the hard palate was measured in multiple tokens of vowels in a /b_b/ context. There was little token-to-token variability (standard deviations of less than 1.0 mm). With the exception of a reversal between the onglide of/e1/ and /{epsilon}/, the height of the tongue differed according to phonological height as expected. The tongue was lower in back vowels than corresponding front vowels, suggesting a biomechanical linkage between tongue height and frontness-backness. Schwa differed from all other vowels, from the "average" tongue configuration seen in stressed vowels, and from the "neutral" configuration in pauses. The talker, a Southerner, diphthongized /I/ and /{epsilon}/, but showed relatively little tongue movement in /aU/(compared to that in /aI/ and /OI/). Relatively little tongue movement was also seen in the /aU/ spoken by a second talker, who showed a significantly greater change in upper lip position in producing /aU/ than in /aI/ or /oI/. This finding suggests that lip rounding and tongue movement may "trade off" as articulatory means for producing the rapid spectral change in diphthongs.

Key Words: speech production • vowel • tongue • American English

Language and Speech, Vol. 29, No. 4, 361-388 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/002383098602900404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
J. E. Flege
Differences in Inventory Size Affect the Location but not the Precision of Tongue Positioning in Vowel Production
Language and Speech, April 1, 1989; 32(2): 123 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]