Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language and Speech
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swingley, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phonetic Detail in the Developing Lexicon

Daniel Swingley

Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics, swingley{at}psych.upenn.edu

Although infants show remarkable sensitivity to linguistically relevant phonetic variation in speech, young children sometimes appear not to make use of this sensitivity. Here, children's knowledge of the soundforms of familiar words was assessed using a visual fixation task. Dutch 19-month-olds were shown pairs of pictures and heard correct pronunciations and mispronunciations of familiar words naming one of the pictures. Mispronunciations were word-initial in Experiment 1 and wordmedial in Experiment 2, and in both experiments involved substituting one segment with[d](a common sound in Dutch)or [g](a rare sound). In both experiments, word recognition performance was better for correct pronunciations than for mispronunciations involving either substituted consonant. These effects did not depend upon children's knowledge of lexical or nonlexical phonological neighbors of the tested words. The results indicate the encoding of phonetic detail in words at 19 months.

Key Words: fixation • language acquisition • lexicon • phoneme • word recognition

Language and Speech, Vol. 46, No. 2-3, 265-294 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/00238309030460021001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
T. Nazzi and J. Bertoncini
Phonetic Specificity in Early Lexical Acquisition: New Evidence from Consonants in Coda Positions
Language and Speech, December 1, 2009; 52(4): 463 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
T. M. Gruenenfelder and D. B. Pisoni
The Lexical Restructuring Hypothesis and Graph Theoretic Analyses of Networks Based on Random Lexicons
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2009; 52(3): 596 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
S. Peperkamp
Phonological Acquisition: Recent Attainments and New Challenges
Language and Speech, June 1, 2003; 46(2-3): 87 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
J. B. Pierrehumbert
Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology
Language and Speech, June 1, 2003; 46(2-3): 115 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
C. C. Best and G. W. McRoberts
Infant Perception of Non-Native Consonant Contrasts that Adults Assimilate in Different Ways
Language and Speech, June 1, 2003; 46(2-3): 183 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
C. T. Fennell and J. F. Werker
Early Word Learners' Ability to Access Phonetic Detail in Well-Known Words
Language and Speech, June 1, 2003; 46(2-3): 245 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]