This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Munson, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Acoustic Correlates of Perceived Masculinity, Perceived Femininity, and Perceived Sexual Orientation

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, munso005{at}umn.edu

Previous studies have shown that a subset of gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) and heterosexual adults produce distinctive patterns of phonetic variation that allow listeners to detect their sexual orientation from audio-only samples of read speech. The current investigation examined the extent to which judgments of sexual orientation from speech are related to judgments of masculinity or femininity made by an independent group of listeners. It also examined the acoustic measures that predict perceived sexual orientation and perceived masculinity/femininity. Ten listeners judged the perceived masculinity or femininity of 44 talkers (11 heterosexual men, 11 heterosexual women, 11 gay men, and 11 lesbian or bisexual women). These were compared to measures of the talkers' perceived sexual orientation, and to acoustic measures of the talker's speech. Listeners judged gay men to sound less masculine than heterosexual men, and lesbian/bisexual women to sound less feminine than heterosexual women. These measures were significantly correlated with measures of perceived sexual orientation. Regression analyses showed that different sets of acoustic measures predicated perceived sexual orientation and perceived masculinity/femininity, and that some acoustic measures were more strongly correlated with one perceptual measure than the other. Results suggest that perceived sexual orientation, perceived masculinity, and perceived femininity are distinct but correlated perceptual parameters.

Key Words: sexual orientation • sociophonetics • speech perception

References

• Avery, J.D., & Liss, J.M. (1994). Acoustic characteristics of less-masculine-sounding male speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3738-3748.
• Bradlow, A., Torretta, G., & Pisoni, D. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20, 255-272.[CrossRef]
• Carahaly, L. (2000). Listener accuracy in identifying the sexual orientation of male and female speakers. Unpublished MA Thesis, Department of Speech and Hearing Science, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
• Clopper, C., & Pisoni, D. (2004). Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 111-140.[CrossRef]
• De Jong, K. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 491-504.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Diehl, R.L., Lindblom, B., Hoemeke, K.A., & Fahey, R.P. (1996). On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 187-208.[CrossRef]
• Docherty, G., & Foulkes, P. (2001). Speaker, speech, and knowledge of sounds. In N. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr & G. Docherty (Eds.), Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues (pp. 105-129). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Gaudio, R. (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech, 69, 30-57.[CrossRef]
• Gordon, E.M. (1997). Sex, speech, and stereotypes: Why women's speech is closer to the standard. Language in Society, 15, 23-52.
• Hermes, D.J., & van Gestel, J.C. (1991). The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 97-102.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Johnson, K., Strand, E., & D'Imperio, M. (1999). Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 359-384.
• Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2005). Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Lass, N.J., Almerino, C.A., Jordan, L.F., & Walsh, J.M. (1980). The effect of filtered speech on speaker race and sex identifications. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 101-112.
• Levon, E. (2006). Hearing "gay": Prosody, interpretation, and the affective judgments of men's speech. American Speech, 81, 56-78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Linville, S. (1998). Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men's speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 50, 35-48.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Moonwoman-Baird, B. (1997). Toward the study of lesbian speech. In A. Livia & K. Hall (Eds.), Queerly phrased (pp.202-213). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Munson, B., Jefferson, S.V., & McDonald, E.C. (2006). The influence of perceived sexual orientation on fricative perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2427-2437.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Munson, B., McDonald, E.C., Deboe, N.L., & White, A.R. (2006). The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men's sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 202-240.
• Nygaard, L., & Lunders, E. (2002). Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice. Memory & Cognition, 30, 583-593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Perry, T.L., Ohde, R., & Ashmead, D. (2001). The acoustic bases for gender identification from children's voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2988-2998.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Pierrehumbert, J.B., Bent, T., Munson, B., Bradlow, A.R., & Bailey, J.M. (2004). The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1905 - 1908.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Podesva, R.J. (2004). The significance of phonetic detail in the construction of social meaning. Presentation given at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, January 8-11, Boston, MA.
• Podesva, R.J., Roberts, S., & Campbell-Kibler, K. (2002). Sharing resources and indexing meaning in the production of gay styles. K. Campbell-Kibler, R. Podesva, S. Roberts & A. Wong (Eds.), Language and sexuality: Contesting meaning in theory and practice (pp. 175 - 189). Palo Alto, CA: CSLI Publications.
• Purnell, T., Idsardi, W., & Baugh, J. (1999). Perceptual and phonetic experimentation on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 10-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Roberts, J. (2001). Child language variation. In J. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), Handbook of language variation and change (pp.333-348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Russo, V. (1987). The celluloid closet: Homosexuality in the movies. New York: Perennial.
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
• Schuler, M.A. (1996). "That's the gayest thing I've ever heard!" The phonetic and phonological content of the perceptions of gay- and straight-sounding speech in English. Unpublished BA Honors Thesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
• Simpson, A.P. (2001). Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal-tract dimensions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2153-2164.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Smyth, R., Jacobs, G., & Rogers, H. (2003). Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society, 32, 329-350.[CrossRef]
• Strand, E. (2000). Gender stereotype effects in speech processing. PhD Dissertation, Department of Linguistics. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
• Strand, E., & Johnson, K. (1996). Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In D. Gibbon (Ed.), Natural language processing and speech technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS Conference, Bielfelt, October, 1996 (pp.14-26). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Terengo, L. (1966). Pitch and duration characteristics of the oral reading of males on a masculinity-femininity dimension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 9, 590-595.
• Thomas, E. (2002). Sociophonetic applications of speech perception experiments. American Speech, 77, 115-147.[CrossRef]
• Van Bezooijen, R. (1995). Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech, 38, 253-265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Van Bezooijen, R., & Gooskens, C. (1999). Identification of language varieties: The contribution of different linguistic levels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 21 - 48.
• Zwicker, E., & Ternhardt, E. (1980). Analytical expression for critical-band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 1523-1525.[CrossRef]

Language and Speech, Vol. 50, No. 1, 125-142 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/00238309070500010601


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Munson, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?